Created for use, not for selling adverts!

Me and a bike An exercise calculator that is deliberately detailed as oversimplification can be misleading and confusing.

A weight loss and exercise calculator that handles food, running, cycling, alcohol, and understands glycogen, ketosis and recovery.

An exercise and weight loss calculator that appears complex, because it is complex and it needs to be complex!




A while ago I was on a cycling forum and there was a thread on how much weight you would lose cycling various distances and how much difference would a Mars bar and a can of Coke make?

Surprisingly I couldn't find a calculator that would give a detailed answer, so I created this one and having spent a lot of time on it I now understand why I couldn't find one.

This calculator is different to all the others that I found because it tries to simulate the effect of eating food and exercising rather than calculate weight and a side effect of these calculations are weight changes.

You specify food eaten, exercise performed and at what time of the day, it then calculates the effect on body weight in small time intervals, between 15 and 60 minutes for 1 to 5 days.

At first glance this sounds like absurd overkill but actually it makes a great deal of sense. The problem with most weight loss advice is that it is very high level, "eat less, exercise more and you will lose weight" when often what is needed is detail.

How much less? What effect will a 5 mile bike ride have if I do one every day? Surely that snack doesn't really matter that much?

Once you try to answer these questions it becomes clear that the longer the calculation periods become the more that answers are hidden. Well, did that 20 minutes of exercise and that extra chocolate bar cancel each other out or not? You can't tell if you look at the day as a whole.

If you are looking at the effects of alcohol, 15 minutes is probably the longest period that gives reasonable results, using 60 minutes give results that are quite far from reality.

As this site is on the internet and the processing is done on web servers not client devices there has to be a compromise between the cost of the servers needed to perform the calculations and the granularity of these calculations.

Currently exercise can be cycling or running along with background exercise, the walking that is part of a normal day.

Although exercise calculations have to be approximations, they are pretty detailed ones. For walking general fitness is not taken in account but it is for cycling and running. This fitness level affects the exact balance of fat and glycogen used during the exercise and the recovery load.

To get this fitness level a couple of apparently irrelevant exercise specific questions are asked, so you can be running fit but not cycling fit.

As keen cyclists may have access to a power meter which will tell them exactly +-2% or less what their power levels are they can use this number, runners don't seem to have similar tech yet so their values always have to be calculated.

For exercise purposes energy expended is based on a 25% bodily efficiency, if you need 200kc to do the exercise then you will need to eat 800kc. Again this is an average number and is in part the reason why so many sources give so many different answers to the same question.

As might be expected the calculator is a simplified version of the body and exercise, many assumptions are made, default values used and handling of special cases limited.

Some might notice that the calculator uses blood glucose and glycogen interchangeably, this is clearly inaccurate but it only has any real effects if you try to set up a scenarios that don't reflect reality just to "prove that the calculator is rubbish".

Clearly if you are an expert on human physiology then the accuracy of these simulations can be ripped apart especially when you look at short time periods, but I am optimistic that on balance the results are sufficiently close to reality that they are informative and useful.

The simulation is intended for people who are looking for a general overview on food, exercise and bodyweight rather than elite level athletes looking for a tool to use as part of a training plan or someone looking for something that is so accurate that it can be relied upon to lose weight.

This calculator was never intended to work with a mobile phone or small screen tablet, I made the decision that I would not attempt to provide support for smaller screens as it would simplify the results to the extent that the whole idea would be pointless.


Personally I find that this calculator has too many questions and a too big an answer to work well on lower screen resolutions. I would suggest that if you are going to spend time using it a tablet, laptop or pc would give a better experience.

I have tried it on an iPhone 5, probably the smallest screen in common use and it works, just about but I wouldn't bother as there isn't the necessary screen space.


See The Effects Of Food And Exercise On Body Weight In Intervals As Short As 15 Minutes.

It's easy to know the "rules" but sometimes much harder to relate them to reality

Daily Summary Results

This is an example of the results of the calculation.
  Energy In Energy Out Difference

Date/
Item
Total Body
Weight(kg)
Glycogen
(%)/(kg)/(kc)
Carbs
(kc)
Protein
(kc)
Fat
(kc)
Alcohol
(kc)
Total
(kc)
Fat
(kc)
Glycogen
(kc)
Alcohol
(kc)
Ketones
(kc)
Total
(kc)
Excess(+)/
Shortage(-)(kc)
15 Feb 2021  
Weight Start of Day 69.00 80/1.80/1500  
Food Eaten   139 0 567 0 706  
Food Cost (TEF)   -14 0 -40 0 -54  
Basal Expenditure   1190 271 0 26 1488  
Background Exercise   55 31 0 0 87  
Cycling   197 161 0 0 358  
Running   142 203 0 0 346  
Recovery   62 16 0 0 78  
Weight End of Day 68.14 48/1.08/903  
SUMMARY -0.86 -32/-0.72/-597   652   2356 -1704
 
GRAND TOTAL -0.86 -32/-0.72/-597   652   2278 -1626
 
GLYCOGEN ADJ -0.15 0/0/0   1249   2356 -1107
 




Detailed Results

This is an example of the results of the calculation.



Day



Time
Total
Body
Weight
(kg)
Glycogen
Water
Weight
(g)

Glycogen
Weight
(g)

Glycogen
Calories
(kc)


Ketones
(kc)

Alcohol
(mg/100ml)/
(kc)


Protein
(g)



Activity
100:0069.00014004001500150/049Eat Fried Breakfast(1)
68.97913883971488150/047Basal usage 62kc, Fat 50kc, Glycogen 12kc, protein 2.2kc
68.97913883971488150/047Cycling(1) started
68.76112383541327150/047Cycling(1) at 104 watts, used fat/glycogen 197kc/161kc
68.76112383541327150/047  Cycling(1), used fat/glycogen ratios (calc/used) 55%/55% 45%/45%
68.76112383541327150/047  Cycling(1) bodily efficiency 25% and 25g of body fat used.
68.76112383541327150/047  Cycling(1) exercise calculated as average VO2 65%
68.76112383541327150/047Cycling(1) completed, Fat 197kc, Glycogen 161kc, totalling 358kc
68.76112383541327160/047Ketosis generated 0.4g of ketones worth 1.4kc
101:0068.87313263791421160/047Digest Fried Breakfast(1) converted 25.1g of carbs to 94kc of glycogen
68.86213183761412160/047Digest Fried Breakfast(1) to glycogen required 9.4kc of glycogen
68.86913183761412160/047Digest Fried Breakfast(1) converted 6g of fat to 54kc or 6.9g of body fat
68.86413143751408160/047  Digest Fried Breakfast(1) to fat required 3.8kc of glycogen
68.84313023721396160/045Basal usage 62kc, Fat 50kc, Glycogen 12kc, protein 2.2kc
68.83812993711392160/043Exercise Recovery usage 16kc, Fat 13kc, Glycogen 3kc, protein 2.3kc
68.83812993711392160/043Running(1) started
68.57611103171189160/043Running(1), used fat/glycogen 142kc/203kc
68.57611103171189160/043  Running(1), used fat/glycogen ratios (calc/used) 41%/41% 59%/59%
68.57611103171189160/043  Running(1) bodily efficiency 25% and 18g of body fat used.
68.57611103171189160/043  Running(1) exercise calculated as average VO2 60%
68.57611103171189160/043Running(1) completed, Fat 142kc, Glycogen 203kc, totalling 346kc
68.57611103171189180/043Ketosis generated 0.4g of ketones worth 1.4kc
102:0068.62811513291233180/043Digest Fried Breakfast(1) converted 11.9g of carbs to 44kc of glycogen
68.62311473281229180/043Digest Fried Breakfast(1) to glycogen required 4.4kc of glycogen
68.62311473281229180/043Fried Breakfast(1) all usable carbs extracted
68.62311473281229180/049Digest Fried Breakfast(1) absorbed 6g of protein
68.63011473281229180/049Digest Fried Breakfast(1) converted 6g of fat to 54kc or 6.9g of body fat
68.62611443271225180/049  Digest Fried Breakfast(1) to fat required 3.8kc of glycogen
68.60411323231213180/046Basal usage 62kc, Fat 50kc, Glycogen 12kc, protein 2.2kc
68.58711233211203180/044Exercise Recovery usage 50kc, Fat 40kc, Glycogen 10kc, protein 2.1kc
68.58711233211203190/044Ketosis generated 0.4g of ketones worth 1.4kc
103:0068.58711233211203190/050Digest Fried Breakfast(1) absorbed 6g of protein


Thermal Effect Of Food (TEF).

me in the garden

The simple view is "calories in" minus "calories out" defines weight loss or gain.

And this is a good starting point but......

Are All Calories Equal, Does A Calorie Always Equal A Calorie, The Answer Is Yes But...

A calorie is a defined value and as such 1 calorie always equals 1 calorie, but this isn't the full story when discussing diet and exercise.
Firstly when you eat food its digestion requires energy, calories, and this cost is significant.

The Thermal Effect Of Food is the most commonly used term to describe this and like most diet related processes nearly everyone agrees on the basic principles but the devil is in the detail.

So if you eat food which yields 1kc then something between 0.1kc and 0.3kc will be required to digest it and we can't simply say carbs require .... etc. as different types of carbs, proteins, fats etc have different energy costs.

Even less frequently discussed is how this energy cost can change.

If you eat some carbs and your glycogen level is below your capacity then the carbs will end up as glycogen, this has an energy cost. If you have reached your glycogen capacity then these carbs are going to end up as fat and the energy cost will be different.

It's the same with exercise, exercise powered by glycogen uses a different total amount of energy to exercise powered by fat and most exercise is a combination of both.

Ultimately muscle movement is powered by adenosine triphosphate (ATP). ATP can be created from fat, glycogen, or ketones, but the complexity of this conversion is different and as conversion of fat to ATP is more complex than glycogen to ATP it requires more energy.

Although the conversion costs are quite small in comparison to the total requirements they do exist and they do need to be considered.

Just to make it even worse a fit person may use less energy performing a task than an unfit person. Although the energy required to move a 70kg person from Point A to Point B is the same regardless of that person's fitness, the fitter person may waste less energy in the process.

Think of an experienced runner jogging along at 7mph with a new runner alongside who is panting and gasping.

Often a web site will can say that on average the TEF is around 10% of the total calories eaten, but this calculator calculates it based on the fat, protein, carbohydrate and alcohol contents of each food item.


Basal Metabolic Rate.

BMR

The energy cost of living.

Basal Metabolic Rate

Basal Metabolic Rate Or The Energy Required To Live.
The Basal Metabolic Rate is the cost of living, how much energy you need to power your body without doing anything else.

If you are not an enthusiastic sportsman and have an office job then your BMR is going to be far greater than the energy expended by exercise.

To give this some context, for a 70kg man the BMR is around 1680kc per day and a one mile walk uses around 100kc.

The BMR is also 1 MET, so a 10 MET activity sustained for a whole day for this 70kg man would use 16,800kc which sounds good, unfortunately this is so demanding that it would also be undoable by nearly everyone.

The Land's End to John o' Groats record by bike requires slightly more calories per day than this, but if you can cycle 1,000 miles in two days then it is unlikely that weight loss is going to be a target for you.



Alcohol And Diet

me in the garden

Excessive alcohol consumption is supported including vomiting and death.

Only a limited effort has been put into modelling alcohol at this level of consumption as it is so dependent upon an individual's experiences.

It is also not an area where experimentation is sensible.

Alcohol And Its Effect On Weight Loss.

Although drinking alcohol is considered normal by much of the UK population alcohol is a toxin and is processed by the body as such, it is not just another food.
The body's special handling of alcohol has some interesting side effects, most of which aren't that significant for a few drinks on a Friday night, but are significant if you have 5 pints a day, 7 days a week.

When alcohol is consumed it enters the blood stream very quickly, the exact speed being affected by the type and quantity of food recently eaten, it is then processed from the blood stream rather than the stomach and intestines.

Because of this the calculator shows alcohol as two values, the blood alcohol level (mg/100m) this is the well understood number and the number of calories that this represents (kc) as it is processed.

The rise and fall of blood alcohol and available calories are independent of each other as the alcohol get absorbs into the blood stream much faster than it can be processed, the often quoted one unit per hour.

In the body the by-products of alcohol processing are used as an energy source in preference to glycogen, ketones or fat.

The processing of alcohol is a high priority process, it stops the conversion of food to glycogen or fat. Possibly surprisingly the TEF of alcohol is high, in the calculator all alcohol is processed with a TEF of 17%.


The Friend Of Instant Weight Loss.

me in the garden


Prior to most people having access to the internet glycogen was pretty much unheard of outside of special interests and this helped low-carb diets flourish.

Glycogen

Glycogen is the favoured energy source for the brain and the body's operations along with higher intensity exercise.
This is an area where the calculator takes certain liberties, it uses glycogen and blood glycose interchangeably and although this is not correct I do believe that it is a reasonable simplification.

The calculator show three glycogen related values, the weight of glycogen within the body, the calories it will yield along with the weight of water that is bound to the glycogen.

As you can see from the results screen for every gram of glycogen there are 3.5 grams of water.

Glycogen is processed with a reasonable degree of reality, there is maximum capacity of around 1,800kc and when exhausted the specified exercises are changed to a reduced intensity.

The calculator starts off with around 1,400kc of glycogen depending upon the body weight.

The calculator varies from reality in that when a gram of glycogen is used its bound water also disappears, rather than waiting for it be passed as urine but it does emphasis the principle.

For many people coming to this calculator glycogen will be new, so seeing the effects on body weight shown so clearly outweighs trying to be 100% accurate. Especially as there is no real way to work out if this now surplus water will be retained or simply sweated out.

Glycogen is currently handled as being in one of three chunks, liver, upper body muscle and lower body muscle and so far this simplification has not seemed significant.


Ketosis?

me in the garden

Ketosis is a real challenge for this calculator as its existence has been known about for a very long time, but publically available research is quite limited.

It is supposedly the reason that low carb diets were invented, as a treatment for epilepsy.

Ketosis

Ketosis as implemented by this calculator is very different from the way that it is often described, but I am pretty sure that I haven't misunderstood the processes.
Ketosis is often described as a process that occurs when the body has run out of glycogen and the body derives energy from ketone bodies, a fuel source generated by the body from fat. These ketone bodies are then used in a very similar way to glycogen.

Yet ketosis is actually an ongoing process that ramps up and down depending upon the amount of carbohydrates that are being absorbed, as carbohydrate digestion decreases ketone production increases.

Ketones are produced by breaking down fat and once created serve a very similar function to glycogen but they are not bound to water in the same way as glycogen.

The problem with ketosis is that the body seems to regard ketones as inferior to glycogen as a power source so as soon as carbohydrates are available ketosis is reduced to background process and glycogen production is resumed.

This why low carb diets can offer such large weight losses in the first few days and then such large weight gains when they are stopped. The glycogen is used up and its associated water is lost, then the glycogen is recreated and its associated water is needed when more carbs are eaten.


EPOC

Trees by the river at night

The EPOC calculations are suspect, there is so little research that agrees.

EPOC - Excess Post-Exercise Oxygen Consumption

How much can I trust these numbers?
Excess Post-Exercise Oxygen Consumption definitely exists, all the experts agree as does our own experience, however this seems to be where agreement ends.

Looking at the research I can make a strong case for the recovery from 20 minutes of exercise at 70% of VO2 Max as being between 1.9kc and 2.8kc, that is of course a huge difference.

What is clear is that intensity and duration drive the recovery which might seem obvious, the more you work the more damage you do to your muscles.

But the two are significantly unbalanced, for example one study had the recovery energy consumption for the same total work done at 70% VO2 max as twice that of the same total exercise expenditure at 50% VO2.

As exercise duration increases beyond an hour the amount of research available plummets, putting the calculations here into an "interesting guess" territory. There also appears to be no consensus over whether or not sex make a difference.


Exercise Uses Less Energry Over Time

A bike

If you start exercising then expect a reduction in weight loss over time.

Weight Loss Is Not A Static Calculation

Weight Loss Is Not A Static Calculation
When discussing weight loss it is sometimes useful to make calculations static and say that cycling one mile at 20mph uses say 30kc. At the very highest level this is fine as it gives a starting point for discussion, but it must be seen as a starting point.

As you exercise more you become fitter, which means that your energy requirement for a specific piece of exercise decreases, and in this context it is likely that over time you will also be losing weight so will require less energy for the same exericse.

For example a 60 year old man weighing 90kg going for a 60 minute ride at 16mph could use Fat 161kc, Glycogen 283kc, totalling 443kc, if drops his weight to 70kg the numbers drop to Fat 152kc, Glycogen 267kc, totalling 419kc.

Okay the difference doesn't seem that great, it's about 5%, because this is a calculation on the flat.

Research suggests that Paula Racliffe, an elite level, athlete became 15% more effecient as a runner over her career. Given that the starting point of this research was an athlete who had just won the World Junior Cross Country champsionship, what would the improvement be for the Couch To 5K type person?




Quirks

A bike crank with a stick pedal spindle

There are some quirks in this calculator, some are almost inevitable and some may be addressed.

When You First "See This Bit", It Looks Dumb.

"This is silly" so the whole calculator must be useless!
There are some things that the calculator does that appears odd, don't really matter and are necessary if you want to produce a meaningful result.

Sequential food processing.
The way that the calculator reports things make it seem like there is sequential food processing instead of the reality where all the food is mixed up as chyme and chocolate bar 1 and chocolate bar 2 are indistinguishable.

But reporting things as one lump makes reporting on the energy derived from that "extra chocolate bar at lunch" much harder to see.

Background Walking
The calculator has the concept of background walking, this is walking that is not done as a specific exercise but takes place during the day as and when, the walk to the bus or around the factory etc.

The calculator reports this by breaking up the miles walked evenly across the day and reports it even when an activity such as running or cycling takes place. This looks silly but there isn't an obviously preferable way to display it.



Other Sites Have Different Views

A generic view of a river with flying swans

Internet flame wars, no thanks.

"My Favourite Site" Gives Different Results.

The internet has sites that say completely different things to you and your results.
There are a lot of health and exercise web sites and many of them will have statements and possibly calculators that won't sit well with the results that this calculator produces.

I am very happy to discuss areas where the calculator could be improved or is actually wrong.

What I don't intend to do is to try and reconcile my results with someone's favourite site that says something like ...cycling typically uses 40 calories per mile... without any supporting arguments.

Many web sites want to be concise so pick averages that seem reasonable to the author and are typical of the expected readership, but without knowing these assumption the articles can be hard to fully understand if you come across them as a result of a web search. If your search gives you a number of sites with the same assumptions then you can end up with a different impression to mine.

What I mean by this is that if you go to a body building site then don't expect the discussion to be about the nutritional needs of an Ironman triathlete and the triathlete's site won't have much to say about the best protein powder to build muscle and minimize fat.

Of course some web sites exist only to post advertising links and simply cut and paste text without any real understanding or interest in the subject. In order to appear higher in search results it may actually be advantageous to have contentious content, you can get your site mentioned on other sites with thing like xyz is saying ..... and is wrong because.



Other Interesting Pages Of Mine.
Buy A Ghost
Picture of a cat with yellow star Buy A Ghost is a light hearted source of one page ghost stories aimed at pubs and restaurants as talking points.

Print them off and put them on the tables or walls and you have an instant talking point.

Aimed at regulars who have run out of things to say or new groups or couples as an ice-breaker.
Initial Programming Language
IPL Screen shot Initial Programming Language possibly the easiest way to learn programming on a Windows computer.

Designed to mimic the simplicity of the 1980s home computers where you could get started in minutes...

...but still powerful enough to do pretty complex things.
Learn To Budget
Money Manager Screen shot Learn To Budget MoneyManger.ipl is a free, MS Windows based, computer program that can be used with children and young adults to practice budgeting

Put simply you get paid once a week, you then spend this money on food, rent etc. If you do just this, then you will be able to save some money and then buy cars, holidays etc.
Please note that these links do not use any tracking cookies or similar technology.